Integrating The US Public Health And Medical Care Systems To Improve Health Crisis Response.

The operational cleavage between the US public health and medical care systems contributed to the country's difficulty in containing community spread of COVID-19 in the pandemic's first months. We provide an overview of the independent evolution of these two systems, drawing on case examples and publicly available outcome data, to demonstrate how three fundamental elements of epidemic response-case finding, mitigating transmission, and treatment-were undermined by the lack of coordination between public health and medical care and how these gaps contributed to health disparities. We propose policy initiatives to address these gaps and facilitate coordination across the two systems: build a case-finding diagnostic system to quickly identify and mitigate the emergence of health threats in communities, develop data systems that facilitate the transfer of critical health intelligence from medical institutions to public health departments, and establish referral pathways for public health practitioners to connect people with medical services. These policies are practicable because they build on existing efforts and those currently in development.

Hierarchy of qualities in global health partnerships: a path towards equity and sustainability.

Despite the exponential growth of global health partnerships (GHPs) over the past 20 years, evidence for their effectiveness remains limited. Furthermore, many partnerships are dysfunctional as a result of inequitable partnership benefits, low trust and accountability and poor evaluation and quality improvement practices. In this article, we describe a theoretical model for partnerships developed by seven global health experts. Through semistructured interviews and an open-coding approach to data analysis, we identify 12 GHP pillars spanning across three interconnected partnership levels and inspired by Maslow's hierarchy of needs. The transactional pillars are governance, resources and expertise, power management, transparency and accountability, data and evidence and respect and curiosity. The collaborative pillars (which build on the transactional pillars) are shared vision, relationship building, deep understanding and trust. The transformational pillars (which build on the collaborative pillars and allow partnerships to achieve their full potential) are equity and sustainability. The theoretical model described in this article is complemented by real-life examples, which outline both the cost incurred when GHPs fail to live up to these pillars and the benefits gained when GHPs uphold them. We also provide lessons learnt and best practices that GHPs should adopt to further increase their strength and improve their effectiveness in the future. To continue improving health outcomes and reducing health inequities globally, we need GHPs that are transformational, not just rhetorically but de facto. These actualised partnerships should serve as a catalyst for the greater societal good and not simply as a platform to accrue and exchange organisational benefits.

Embracing Social Engagement in Academic Medicine: Ongoing Challenges and How to Move Forward.

Academic medical centers have historically been defined by scientific discovery for health advancement. However, the mounting challenges of modern medicine are fueled by the social, economic, and political determinants of health that predict vulnerability and accelerate poor outcomes. To surmount looming threats to health, the academic medical mindset must equally prioritize social engagement-work that directly addresses the systemic social causes of health and illness-alongside the traditional pedagogy of laboratory-based, translational, and clinical research. Considerable barriers still exist, rooted in historical priorities and significant funding structured to reward scientific achievements. Academic medicine has the agency to support elements of restructuring to help prioritize research, education, and training to more prominently include social engagement. Crucial steps to ensure the success of this process include prioritizing financial commitments to community-engaged scholarship and programmatic work and rigorous recognition of faculty who work on socially engaged scholarship within promotion schemes. The COVID pandemic presents an unprecedented opportunity for academic medicine to reflect on the breadth of the work we promote and encourage, work that reflects all the complex elements of health-those that can be documented in a lab notebook and those rooted in social systems and structures that we have neglected for too long.